A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving prospective neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result spots are matter to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic in the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather visual proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and problems attached to the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is motivated by issue for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing link to the area and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a couple basically attempting to produce a family property in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that every one operates are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find them selves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water through a storm Paul Feely and René Collier to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court should decide if the wall as created complies with setting up permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning conditions. Yet the human ingredient stays central: neighbours who have to Dwell along with each other extensive once the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how speedily an area disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially built, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. Irrespective of whether it's going to finally be altered, taken off, or completed as planned will rely upon the court docket’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.